• Home
  • Ux Design
  • Art
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • More
    • Home
    • Ux Design
    • Art
    • Blog
    • Contact
  • Sign In
  • Create Account

  • My Account
  • Signed in as:

  • filler@godaddy.com


  • My Account
  • Sign out

Signed in as:

filler@godaddy.com

  • Home
  • Ux Design
  • Art
  • Blog
  • Contact

Account


  • My Account
  • Sign out


  • Sign In
  • My Account

Interchange - A Financial Literacy App

The Big Picture

Problem Statement

"How might we make financial planning and education more accessible and inclusive?" 


User research, concept testing and ongoing analysis led me to develop Interchange as a solution. Like a cross between a dating app and a networking site, Interchange leverages users’ existing social networks to help them connect. They can find peers who share similar financial interests, or access mentors they didn't realize were already in their network. By prioritizing personal interactions in a user-friendly setting, Interchange aims to make financial literacy readily accessible AND personally applicable.  An additional Learn & Earn component helps users develop and verify their financial expertise. 

My roles

User Research & Analysis

User Research & Analysis

User Research & Analysis

  • Researched and wrote interview questions
  • Solicited interviewees using a randomization method
  • Conducted user interviews
  • Behavioral archetypes
  • User journey maps
  • Competitive analysis
  • Concept design & concept testing


Information Architecture

User Research & Analysis

User Research & Analysis

  • Site map
  • User flows
  • Card sorting & tree test
  • Low-fidelity wire frames
  • Prototyping

User Interface Design

User Research & Analysis

User Interface Design

  • Mood board
  • Style guide & toolkit
  • Logo design
  • Typography
  • Iconography
  • Mid to High fidelity design


User Research & Analysis

Qualitative Research

My team consisted of 4 members: Remy Coronado, Stephanie Munro, Claire Deutscher, Janet Arkills. We conducted 17 interviews averaging 50 minutes per interview.


Money is a sensitive topic, yet participants shared willingly. I found my natural empathy & curiosity were great assets. I could tell when participants had more to say and felt comfortable veering organically off-script to dig deeper. I asked perceptive follow-up questions, leading to valuable insights and ensuring comprehensive results.


Data analysis led us to two key archetypes:

The Avoidant

The responsible

The responsible

  • Struggled to understand basic financial concepts
  • Felt easily overwhelmed which led them to neglect their financial decisions

The responsible

The responsible

The responsible

  • Solid understanding of financial basics
  • Wanted to prioritize financial responsibilities, yet felt overwhelmed by competing responsibilities

Competitive & Comparative Analysis

I noticed our Primary competitor apps focused on day-to-day budgeting and money management. Based on our user research I identified gaps where we could help users: 

  • more personalized assistance 
  • easier access to trustworthy information 
  • help understand big-picture ideas

Ideation Workshopping

Next we conducted an Ideation Workshop with X participants to further our design thinking. I found this similar to user interviews as participants often had more ideas to share than what they initially presented. I found it easy to solicit more ideas and explanations of their thinking processes.


 For each of our 2 archetypes, workshop participants generated ideas for how we might help users:

  • Identify and prioritize their financial values/goals 
  • Shift their money habits 
  • Appeal to their temperaments (both responsible and avoidant) 
  • Save them time  
  • Identify trustworthy sources  

Participants then collaborated to cluster responses into 5-6 categories. 


We used these categories to generate our value propositions, which drove our initial concept designs.

In our concept testing, my design was selected by 85% of participants.

What was loved

 Matching through social network connections

  • “To be matched with someone would be really helpful” 
  • “Sometimes I need input from other people with expertise that will point me to a source”

Chat through text, video, or in-person meet-ups

  • “I think it’d be really nice to connect with a real person”
  • “The social aspect of this is appealing”
  • “Community based interactions are important”

Resource access

  • “I like that it uses other people's activities to get more information”
  • “I’d use it to just like, get simple budgeting tools and the correct resources and hearing some other people's experience”  

What was needed/wanted

Match credibility

  • “How would you verify whether the person was a credible resource?”
  • “It would be helpful to see how many people a match has helped, so you know if they’re really helpful or not”
  • “How would the badges work?”

Privacy features

  • “Maybe people would be offended by how many badges they have or their score? So maybe adding privacy filters/features?”

Community links

  • “It would be great if it was an actual dating app”
  • “Maybe add in community events?”

Information Hierarchy

Site Map

User Flows

User Flows

The site map was developed to identify how key components would interact with each other throughout the site.

User Flows

User Flows

User Flows

Four user flows were created to identify key app functions, including:

  

  • Initial profile set-up
  • Individual matching
  • Group matching
  • Resource exchange

Card Sort

User Flows

Card Sort

Card sort verified the organization of sitemap and key functionalities.

Low fidelity prototype used for usability testing

Copyright © 2024 Janet Arkills - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by GoDaddy

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

DeclineAccept